2009 Dec. 27, 2009

Climate history was rewritten - at least that's what happened Wikipedia

Wikipedia is widely regarded as a reliable source of information.
Indeed, in many cases it is.
But not in the case of climate-related data.
Since the day it became clear that more than 5,000 entries relating to the history of climate Wikipedia, dictated by the Wikipedia editor to hide data that show the previous warming period called "medieval warming period."

William Connolly is a British scientist and editor of Wikipedia, who took on his own the project climate change the world and rewrite history, more than 5,000 Wikipedia entries presented information about the ancient warming period.

This period of warming is very stuck in their throats of climate scientists who supported the theory of global warming and man, for how can we explain previous warming was not a period of industrial emissions of carbon?

Parshat Keleimete - Gate which exposed correspondence non-mail from supporters of the theory scientists trying to find ways to undermine the theory of global warming opponents revealed to the world the fact that a real consensus among scientists on the subject, as they tried to convince us.

Was exposed to the correspondence of scientists attempt to hide or obscure the medieval warming period.

This experience is inherently futile as dozens of articles and books written on this period, which apparently brought prosperity warming agricultural extension of life expectancy.

In 2006, long before the affair exposed miles, a scientist named David Edeimeinge University of Oklahoma declared before the U.S. Senate Committee of Congress that he had received mail from a senior climate scientist who wrote him that:

"We need to get rid of the medieval warming period."

His statement in front of the Senate should serve as a very serious warning sign about how Agel global warming agenda and man-conceived and executed in cooperation with the support of international media green organizations worldwide who do not understand that supporting agenda just seems such a green face. Fact is pitch black.

Agenda is conceived as a way to create "a new common enemy" just by the words of "Club of Rome" who sought "a new enemy unite us" to find the perfect guilt - of humanity itself.

"War on terror" has not yet exhausted itself as a means of control and navigation on public opinion, but if society be persuaded that there is global warming, and through fear is not based on various horror scenarios caused this warming, the world would support the tax change and creating new taxes on carbon emissions and trade between national carbon The global government takes another step forward.

Copenhagen Conference, which turned out as farce absurd not only because of the embarrassing fuckup occurred Lai - Gore, Yakir elites (perhaps ex ...) by announcing that within five years the ice caps will disappear, and claimed that the data arrived climate scientist denies it, it was absurd that the world of active resistance against environmental conference Monbeat caused many more to open her eyes.

Unlike many of the blind eye the conference participants ...

Continued the discussion on this post or on other issues forum project

הדפסת מאמר Print Article
Share |
To send this post by e-mail, or post it to the forum, use this link:
http://www.emetaheret.org.il/?p=2690
tabs-top

Highlights:
Content displayed in the Site is for purely academic study.
Displayed information should not prompt or recommendation of any kind, especially with regard to your health.
In case of a decision concerning your health, change in diet or anything else, consult a qualified doctor.
Also, do not see the information displayed in absolute truth, but more well-documented presentation based on evidence obtained by collating data.
This is your responsibility as human beings with a head on your shoulders to research and then come to conclusions based on all information available.
Limitation of Liability: Another real project site is not responsible for the accuracy, integrity or efficiency of the information or products presented on the site. Authors of articles are opinions of the authors of articles only. The information presented on the website is educational and entertainment purposes only of the use of information is the responsibility of readers of the site.

10 Comments on "climate history was rewritten - at least that's what happened Wikipedia"

  1. By Yael Y..:

    Excellent :) Thank you Fang.

  2. By Noam:

    Pah pah, it seems that begins here and kind of awakening ...

  3. By FreeThinker:

    Hello Niv

    I'm afraid to write the history written on the internet is not new and many groups take part in this distortion of history.

    There are many examples of groups that use Wikipedia for this purpose, for example:

    FOX Network -
    http://crooksandliars.com/2007/08/15/fox-news-caught-re-writing-wikipedia-history # comment-90 548

    Camera - Committee for the accuracy of the reports of Middle East reporting in the U.S. (sarcasm at its best) - http://crooksandliars.com/2007/08/15/fox-news-caught-re-writing-wikipedia-history # comment-90 548

    The war in Iraq - http://www.darkmatter101.org/site/2007/10/21/wikipedia-and-iraq-rewriting-history/

    And there are too many examples of distortions in the project Wikipedia, so that distorted the history of climate should not raise an eyebrow, perhaps only to those who think Wikipedia is the Torah from Sinai is (which is doubtful).

  4. By Limor;

    Wikipedia reliable source of information?
    Was never a reliable source of information!
    Most reliable source of information remains in books ...
    Anyone looking for a job "easy" relying on information from the Internet - Wikipedia His problem ...

    • By limorwolf:

      We both Limor here (:
      I'll try now to go always with the name in English and Hebrew, as I do normally to
      Do not confuse the people here.
      DA Limor, the forum also invited .. (:

  5. By Astupidog :

    It seems that the reason that middleage warm period or the MWP has lost its importance is greatly improved measurements recently and it therefore seems that what was looked beyond the period of global warming like what you see today was a local warming effect is limited. You can read about it here:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MWP_and_LIA_in_IPCC_reports

    From what I saw shelves of some values and the conversation that's why many Lsachatobim and deliberate concealment of the period.

  6. The conference was a farce
    It will be held
    Increased taxes they continue in the program and nothing happened
    They Mazedzim calm
    But the conference is closed on government information
    Water and electricity costs rose Tax Tax Police spam

  7. By Raphael:

    Hi,
    Rewrite problems without having to enter the history,
    The simple fact is that you can not prove that the person affects the global climate.

    It sounds very logical transition created by pollution in the industrial world were damaging, but no controlled experiment that shows whether a global impact.

    Can be equally, we predict changes in climate today, Hines natural part of climate change is happening on Earth.

    But global warming is a sexy and it sells and it makes money so clear to me why this dominant view in the press.

    Rafi

  8. By limorwolf:

    John McKay is one of the founders of the food chain Whole Foods is opposed to reform the health system of the Obama administration, skeptical about global warming and against the workers' committees.
    Recently fired because he made views

    Read and believe

    http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART2/043/458.html?hp=1&loc=40&tmp=3305

Instructions for writing comments:
1. Keep proper language
2. Claim or expression you wrote the opposite opinion? Attach links for additional information that supports your opinion. A sentence like: "It's just a silly conspiracy theory" is not an appropriate response.
3. Even if something seems unreal, does not mean it's not true. Every post has links to sources of information and links to more information. First read them, did some research and then write a comment.
4. Write the name and last name, or choose a unique nickname, or (at best) Subscribe site, so we know who wrote the response and treat accordingly.
5. If you are new or Scerptam respond to your comment more than one link, wait patiently until your reaction would be approved.
6. Must read the Terms of Use site before posting a comment.
Project manager reserves the right to edit comments that are inappropriate and / or block surf responding ..

Leave a comment

Spam protection by WP-SpamFree